SEMH Education

SEMH Education

Share this post

SEMH Education
SEMH Education
šŸ”¬Rethinking Behaviour Policies: Why a Trauma-Informed Approach is EssentialšŸ“

šŸ”¬Rethinking Behaviour Policies: Why a Trauma-Informed Approach is EssentialšŸ“

Why Traditional School Behaviour Policies Fail SEND Pupils, and How Trauma-Informed, Restorative Approaches Improve Outcomes.

SEMH Education's avatar
SEMH Education
Jun 04, 2025
āˆ™ Paid
3

Share this post

SEMH Education
SEMH Education
šŸ”¬Rethinking Behaviour Policies: Why a Trauma-Informed Approach is EssentialšŸ“
1
Share

šŸ‘‹ Welcome to SEMH Education!

Every week, I share insights, strategies, and tips from my experience working with children and professionals on social, emotional, and mental health (SEMH) in education. This week, we’re exploring behaviour policies and how to rethink them in a trauma-informed way!

You know the children we’re talking about. Traditional behaviour policies don’t work for them. Professionals often say they have a ā€˜don’t-care’ attitude towards school, and they never seem motivated. The current sanctions don’t prevent them from exhibiting ā€˜persistent disruptive behaviour’, and they’re always given detentions and isolations!

Let me know you’re here! Clicking the ā™„ļø button or pressing the ā€˜L’ key on your keyboard shows me you’re here and enjoying my content 😊.

If you’d like more tips for supporting children, put your email below, and you’ll get access to all of my previous & future posts!

Traditional school behaviour policies rely on rewards and punishments to enforce discipline. But what if these policies are actually making things worse, especially for children with SEND?

Anne Emerson’s (2022) research in The Case for Trauma-Informed Behaviour Policies highlights how these policies often exacerbate anxiety, disengagement, and school exclusions. Instead of fostering positive behaviour, they create cycles of punishment that disproportionately affect the most vulnerable.

šŸ”¬ What the Research Says

  • The problem with rewards & punishments: Traditional policies assume all children can self-regulate if motivated. But for children with SEND, executive function difficulties make rule-following harder (Timpe, 2016).

  • Exclusion as a consequence: Children with SEND are disproportionately excluded for ā€œpersistent disruptive behaviourā€ (DfE, 2023/24).

  • The trauma connection: Reprimands and exclusions can create a ā€œfight, flight, or freezeā€ response, increasing behavioural issues rather than reducing them (Kerns et al., 2015).

Share

šŸ“ Inside the Full Analysis (For Paid Subscribers)

In the full post, I break down:


āœ… Why traditional policies are failing in real schools (case studies and evidence).


āœ… How to implement trauma-informed alternatives that improve behaviour and emotional well-being.


āœ… A step-by-step guide for educators to shift from control-based to support-based approaches.

šŸ”’ Paid Subscribers Exclusive: The Full Analysis

35% Discount Code here —> Subscribe to SEMH Education

Keep reading with a 7-day free trial

Subscribe to SEMH Education to keep reading this post and get 7 days of free access to the full post archives.

Already a paid subscriber? Sign in
Ā© 2025 Kieran Smith
Privacy āˆ™ Terms āˆ™ Collection notice
Start writingGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture

Share